Skip to content

Matter protocol similarities #308

Open

Description

@backkem

I was reading the Matter spec an it occurred to me how similar some of the protocol is to OSP. Matter also does mDNS discovery and secure channel using PAKE and even has a basic remote playback device type. I wonder if it makes sense to unify both efforts. Though Matter doest include a video streaming spec yet I believe.

Activity

  1. tidoust commented on Aug 29, 2023

    @tidoust
    Member

    Yes, the Second Screen Working Group is looking at interoperability and possible alignment with Matter:

    What the group did not have was a tracking issue, thanks for creating one @backkem!

  2. backkem commented on Aug 30, 2023

    @backkem
    ContributorAuthor

    Great comparison @mfoltzgoogle! sorry I didn't catch that earlier.

    I wanted to share a look at discovery/rendezvous from a functional standpoint. It seems each approach is born from a slightly different use-case:

    • Matter focuses on creating an established network or 'Fabric'. This makes sense in a home setting where you connect once and get access to multiple (IoT) devices for longer time period.
    • The OSP focuses more on point connections such as a meeting room with a TV you want to cast to.
    • Similarly the local-peer-to-peer proposal puts a specific focus on more ephemeral connections between devices that are physically in close proximity.

    They all seem valid use-cases to me. I think the merit to building these on a unified stack is to foster (broader) adoption and avoid a fractured ecosystem (as embodied by this comment). Maybe there is room to contribute a lightweight connection establishment flow back to Matter based on the OSP work.

  3. anssiko commented on Aug 31, 2023

    @anssiko
    Member

    @backkem, I like how you bucketed discovery requirements into "established" and "ephemeral" connections.

    I'd want to refer here to the Matter browser support issue project-chip/connectedhomeip#4270 you opened, also acknowledged in our Second Screen WG March 2023 discussions. I think it is worth revising this issue with new information to see if the "future" is now. @backkem you're welcome to give the WG a brief update on your latest thinking at our upcoming meeting. This issue is now on the agenda: w3c/secondscreen-wg#10

    I'm expecting @mfoltzgoogle to give an update on a few specific technical areas of investigation for Matter and OSP interoperability. I'm also expecting Apple participants to attend which might help bridge the two efforts.

  4. rektide commented on Jan 9, 2024

    @rektide

    Amazon now has Matter casting in the Prime Video app and on their Echo Show 15 device. https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/9/24030324/amazon-matter-casting-echo-show-fire-tv-prime-video

  5. backkem commented on Dec 13, 2025

    @backkem
    ContributorAuthor

    Matter 1.5 has shipped initial WebRTC support (mainly for camera streaming). It comes with a standardized way to perform signaling between Matter devices, afterwards the WebRTC stack takes over as transport.

    I think technically one could implement the OSP Application Protocol (or directly the Presentation API, Remote Playback API or Local Peer-to-Peer API) on top of this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions