Skip to content

Hostname canonicalization has surprising interactions #259

Open

Description

@jeremyroman

What is the issue with the URL Pattern Standard?

This has been noticed at least twice now and probably merits its own issue:
#239 (comment)
#258

Most notable, hostname parts that look like IP addresses can end up being canonicalized into full IP addresses in ways that are surprising and nonsensical, like 192.168.* expanding to 192.0.0.168.* (because technically 192.168 is a valid IP address notation).

As noted in the comment, the same is true of port, but it's harder to discover how to work around it for hostnames.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions