Skip to content

Make sure all IDL members have "dfn" in prose #397

Closed

Description

@tidoust

ReSpec shipped a new feature yesterday that warns about missing definitions in prose for IDL members.

ReSpec now reports 25 warnings on the Presentation API, some of them we should fix (e.g. binaryType, connection properties). Now, ReSpec also complains about the interface names themselves, where it makes sense to me to have the IDL be the definition, as done in the Presentation API. I filed an issue against ReSpec: https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/997

Activity

  1. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 5, 2017
  2. markafoltz commented on Jan 9, 2017

    @markafoltz
    Contributor

    I believe this should be addressed by PR #403.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions